Language editing quality: tailored (Writefull) or generic (ChatGPT).This makes Writefull less flexible, but also much more tailored to a set of tasks and to the norms of academic writing. In ChatGPT terms, it always uses the same ‘prompts’. Writefull doesn’t work with prompts: it offers a predefined set of features, like copyediting, which you use within Word or Overleaf. This allows for great flexibility: it can help you with any part of the writing process you find difficult! Be careful, though, that you craft a prompt that works well for an academic text, and that the output doesn’t change your message. For example, to help you write a sentence, you could give it the prompt ‘Complete the following sentence: …’, and see what it comes up with. How to use: predefined (Writefull) or prompt-based (ChatGPT)Īs ChatGPT is generic, it needs prompts.These models were trained and vetted for these tasks, and tailored to research writing. Writefull offers language models developed to help with specific tasks: to copyedit, proofread, paraphrase, generate abstracts or titles, or make sentences academic. You can use it to output ideas, challenge an argument, develop software, create exam questions, write essays, and much more. ChatGPT is a so-called ‘large language model’, that can generate text for any type of task. text generation (ChatGPT)ĬhatGPT and Writefull are very different in nature. The type of model: language editing (Writefull) vs.How can ChatGPT benefit your academic writing? And how does it differ from Writefull? It can output sentences, rewrites, or entire texts. Give it any prompt, and it gives you a response that’s hard to distinguish from human-written material. Channel 4 convinced 138,000 people that they would prefer to spend a rainy Saturday morning watching Rowan Atkinson in Johnny English Strikes Again rather than try to glimpse King Charles III being anointed with holy oil from a 12th-century ceremonial spoon.It’s been hard to miss: the launch of ChatGPT, a chat interface based on GPT-3. Some channels chose to ignore the coronation altogether, with mixed results. The television viewing figures do not include the small but substantial number of people who will have watched the coronation through livestreams and through non-traditional broadcast methods such as YouTube. There was limited airtime given to anti-monarchist views during Saturday’s broadcasts, despite concern over the police arresting the head of the leading republican movement hours before the coronation. Meanwhile, the Guardian reported concerns within the BBC about a policy of submitting some footage to the royal palace for approval. They were upset that the BBC was only willing to share live footage of the coronation at a very high price. ITV’s coverage topped out at 3.6 million viewers and Sky’s coverage peaked at 800,000 across Sky News and Sky Showcase, according to official Barb viewing figures provided by agency Digital-i.īefore the coronation, there had been a dispute with newspaper groups – and the smaller channels GB News and TalkTV – over access to footage. The vast majority of the audience watched the BBC’s coverage, which was helmed by Huw Edwards and broadcast across BBC One, BBC Two and the BBC News channel to a peak audience of 15.5 million. The viewing figures for the coronation at Westminster Abbey may have been boosted by the poor weather in parts of the UK, which forced people to stay inside and meant outdoor viewing parties were largely empty due to the rain.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |